Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR5632 13
Original file (NR5632 13.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
701 S. COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 1001
ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490

 

BC
Docket No: 05632-13
15 January 2014

From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records
To: Secretary of the Navy

 

Sun:

 

REVIEW OF RECORD OF FORM]
i pears inte oe i:

   

Ref: (a) 10 U.S.C. 1552

Encl: (1) DD Form 149 with attachments
(2) Case summary
(3) ‘Subject'’s naval record

1. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a
former enlisted member of the United States Navy, filed
enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that his
record reflect the reentry code of RE-8 (temporary medical
conditions or unsatisfactory initial performance and conduct
(available to recruits assigned to Recruit Training Command for

   

initial training only)) vice RE-4 (not recommended for
retention) in block 27 of her DD Form 214 (Certificate of
Release or Discharge from Active Duty) issued on 16 September
2008.

2. he Board, consisting o fi and Ms

 
 

 

Eo iewed Petitioner's allegations of error and
injustice on 15 January 2014, and, pursuant to its regulations,
determined that the corrective action indicated below should be
taken on the available evidence of record. Documentary material
considered by the Board consisted of the enclosures, naval
records, and applicable statutes, regulations and policies, and

enclosures (1) through (3).

3. The Board, having reviewed all the facts of record
pertaining to Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice
finds as follows:

a. Petitioner enlisted in the Navy on 15 August 2008. He
received an uncharacterized entry level separation on 16
September 2008, with an RE-4 reentry code (not recommended for
retention). Under governing directives he could have received a
code of “RE-8” or “RE-4.”

CONCLUSION:

Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record, the

snacee!) AAR lees EReat 4 carta Ker * HL > + “ + + eS .
Board concludes that it would se in ene interest of justice in

this case to remove the stigma associated with a reentry code of
RE-4.

Accordingly, the Board finds the existence of an injustice
warranting the following corrective action.

RECOMMENDATION:

a. That Petitioner's naval record be corrected to show that
he received a reentry code of “RE-8" vice “RE-4".

b. That a copy of this report of proceedings be filed in his
record.

4. Pursuant to Section 6(c) of the revised Procedures of the
Board for Correction of Naval Records (32 Code of Federal
Regulations, Section 723.6(c) it is certified that a quorum was
present at the Board’s review and deliberations, and that the
foregoing is a true and complete record of the Board’s
proceedings in the above entitled matter.

   
 

ES EXNI@IOS
Acting Recorder

 

ROBERT D. ZSALMAN
Recorder

5. Pursuant to the delegation o authority set out in Section
6(e) of the revised Procedures of the Board for Correction of
Naval Records (32 Code of Federal Regulation, Section 723.6(e) })
and having assured compliance with its provisions, it is hereby
announced that the foregoing corrective action, taken under the
authority of reference (a), has been approved by the Board on
behalf of the Secretary of the Navy.

lias onseaiat “anineeeen

ROBERT D. ZSALMAN
Acting Executive Director

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR6862 13

    Original file (NR6862 13.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed written application, enclosure (1), with this Board requesting, in effect, to change his reentry code of RE-4 (not recommended for retention). The Board, consisting of Ms. Henkel and Messrs. Rothlein and Zsalman, reviewed allegations of error and injustice on 23 July 2014, and pursuant to its regulations, determined that relief should be granted. That Petitioner’s naval record be corrected to...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR220 14

    Original file (NR220 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 §. The Board, consisting of Mr. 4salman, Mr. Tew, and Ms. White-Olson, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 18 June 2014, and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. That Petitioner's naval record be corrected to show that he received a reentry code of “RE-3R” (not meeting the professional growth criteria)...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR7678 13

    Original file (NR7678 13.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a Former enlisted member of the United States Navy, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that his record reflect the reentry code of RE-3E (Inducted/Enlisted/Extended/Reenlisted in error) vice RE-4 recommended for reenlistment) in block 27 of his DD Form 21 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Acti ) 4 3 March 2009. ry The,,Board, consisting oa AES a reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR6960 13

    Original file (NR6960 13.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    He was then recommended for administrative separation due to his diagnosed personality disorder. CONCLUSION: Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record, the Board finds the existence of an injustice warranting a change of Petitioner’s reentry code. That Petitioner’s naval record be corrected to show that on 9 April 2008, he was issued an RE-3G reentry code vice the RE-4 now of record.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR630 14

    Original file (NR630 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a former enlisted member of the Marine Corps, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that his RE-30 (orders refusal) reentry code, issued on 28 December 2013, be changed. The Board, consisting of Mr. Zsalman, and Mr. Tew, and Ms. White-Olson, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 18 June 2014, and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the partial corrective action indicated...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR3780 14

    Original file (NR3780 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a former enlisted member of the Navy, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting: that his RE-4 {not recommended for reenlistment) reentry code be changed. The Board, consisting of Mr. Grover, Mr. Rothleim, and Mr. Clemmons, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and ‘injustice on 10 December 2014 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the partial corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR2623 14

    Original file (NR2623 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a former enlisted member of the Navy, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that his RE-4 (not recommended for retention) reentry code be changed per reference (b). The Board, consisting of Messrs. Zsalman and Exnicios and Ms. Montgomery, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 3 June 2014 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR2947 13

    Original file (NR2947 13.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 7015. In the alternative, that his general characterization of service be upgraded to honorable, RE-4 (not recommended for retention) reentry code be changed to RE-1, and receive full involuntary separation pay. Although Petitioner was medically diagnosed with an adjustment disorder, the DD Form 214 erroneously states that he was discharged by reason of a “PERSONALITY DISORDER”.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR4679 13

    Original file (NR4679 13.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a former enlisted member of the Navy, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting a change in his RE-4 (not recommended for reenlistment) reentry code, which was issued on 13 April 2013. At that time he was recommended for promotion and continued service in the Navy Reserve, and assigned an RE-4 reentry code. Such a code may also be assigned if the commanding officer does not recommend the individual for reenlistment.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR1655 14

    Original file (NR1655 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The Board, consisting of Mr. Zsalman, Ms. Polk, and Mr. Tew, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 30 July 2014, and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. That Petitioner's naval record be corrected to show that on 2 September 2004, she was assigned an RE-3G reentry code vice the RE-4 reentry code. ROBERT D. ZSALMAN BRIAN J. GEORGE Recorder Acting Recorder S. Pursuant to...